UB
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
ukrainian-bridge
Website:
Employees number:
6
Number of followers:
458
NAICS:
541821
Industry Type:
Homepage:
ukrainianbridge.org
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
UKR_2722338
Scan Status:
In-progress
Ukrainian bridge Company CyberSecurity Posture
ukrainianbridge.org
A non-governmental platform which builds bridges between Ukraine and the world's largest innovation hubs.
Ukrainian bridge A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
UB Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
UB
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
UB Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
UB
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
UB Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
Ukrainian Government
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In a series of malicious cyber activities, Amin Timovich Stigal, allegedly part of Russia's GRU, executed wiper attacks on Ukrainian government networks. These attacks, made to resemble ransomware but with a destructive intent, resulted in loss of data and impeded governmental functions. With the WhisperGate malware, systems became inoperable, impacting government, non-profit, and IT sectors. The operation extended to defacing websites with threatening messages and unauthorized sales of stolen sensitive data, inducing widespread fear among Ukrainian citizens. Notably, personal health records were part of the exfiltrated information, compromising privacy on a large scale. The attacks not only disrupted Ukraine's digital infrastructure but also probed allied networks in NATO and the U.S., signifying a broader threat to international cybersecurity and stability.
UB Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for UB
Incidents vs Government Relations Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ukrainian bridge in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ukrainian bridge in 2025.
Incident Types UB vs Government Relations Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ukrainian bridge in 2025.
Incident History — UB (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
UB Company Subsidiaries
A non-governmental platform which builds bridges between Ukraine and the world's largest innovation hubs.
Loading...
UB Similar Companies
Australian Public Service
The work of the Australian Public Service (APS) touches almost every part of Australian life. We provide policy advice to the Australian government on everything from national health to foreign policy. Work towards something greater than yourself. The Australian Public Service (APS) offers a clear
.png)
UB CyberSecurity News
November 20, 2025 08:00 AM
SOC Prime attracts investment from u.ventures for AI solutions in cybersecurity
u.ventures led a new investment round for SOC Prime. The funds will be used to scale the AI-native cybersecurity platform and strengthen its...
November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
ESET APT report finds state-backed hackers escalate cyberattacks, target Ukraine’s grain and energy sectors
New research from ESET detailed a surge in espionage and financially motivated cyber operations from state-aligned threat groups between...
November 04, 2025 08:00 AM
Ukraine road bridge destroyed in war reconstructed with help of UK finance and supplies
Vyshhorod Bridge, which links a remote part of the Kyiv region with the capital and is used by thousands of residents and heavy goods...
October 24, 2025 07:00 AM
Welsh Steel Firm to Help Rebuild Ukraine with £1.1m Bridge Contract
A Welsh engineering company has won a £1.1 million contract to manufacture steel girders for a new bridge near Kyiv that was destroyed...
October 18, 2025 07:00 AM
US seizes $15bn in bitcoin from Cambodian gang leader, Khmelnytskyi crypto ring and other cybersecurity news
The week's key cybersecurity stories. 18.10.2025 ForkLog. The week's key cybersecurity stories. Hackers have adapted malware for blockchain.
September 19, 2025 07:00 AM
Russian Hacking Groups Gamaredon and Turla Attacking Organizations to Deploy Kazuar Backdoor
In early 2025, cybersecurity researchers observed an unprecedented collaboration between two Russian APT groups targeting Ukrainian...
September 15, 2025 07:00 AM
Join the Industry-Academia Network of the Cybersecurity Skills Academy: call open to Moldova and Ukraine
On 15 September, the European Commission opened a new call to higher education institutions, vocational education and training providers,...
August 28, 2025 07:00 AM
Maritime cybersecurity is the iceberg no one sees coming
The maritime industry faces rising cybersecurity threats, from ransomware and malware to cyber espionage and GNSS disruption.
August 08, 2025 07:00 AM
Ukraine pulls civilians back from parts of endangered Kherson
Vladimir Putin has never given up hope of retaking the city Russia lost in a humiliating defeat in 2022.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
UB CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Ukrainian bridge
The official website of Ukrainian bridge is https://www.ukrainianbridge.org/.
Ukrainian bridge ’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Ukrainian bridge ’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 740, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Ukrainian bridge ’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Ukrainian bridge currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Ukrainian bridge have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Ukrainian bridge is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Ukrainian bridge have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Ukrainian bridge does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Ukrainian bridge comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Ukrainian bridge is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Ukrainian bridge have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Ukrainian bridge does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Ukrainian bridge comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Ukrainian bridge is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Ukrainian bridge have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Ukrainian bridge is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Ukrainian bridge
Ukrainian bridge operates primarily in the Government Relations Services industry.
Number of Employees at Ukrainian bridge
Ukrainian bridge employs approximately 6 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Ukrainian bridge
Ukrainian bridge presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Ukrainian bridge ’s LinkedIn Followers
Ukrainian bridge ’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 458 followers.
NAICS Classification of Ukrainian bridge
Ukrainian bridge is classified under the NAICS code 541821, which corresponds to Others.
Ukrainian bridge ’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Ukrainian bridge does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Ukrainian bridge ’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Ukrainian bridge maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ukrainian-bridge.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Ukrainian bridge
As of December 15, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Ukrainian bridge has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Ukrainian bridge has an estimated 1,470 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Ukrainian bridge ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack.
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Wiper Attacks on Ukrainian Government Networks
Description: Amin Timovich Stigal, allegedly part of Russia's GRU, executed wiper attacks on Ukrainian government networks. These attacks, made to resemble ransomware but with a destructive intent, resulted in loss of data and impeded governmental functions. With the WhisperGate malware, systems became inoperable, impacting government, non-profit, and IT sectors. The operation extended to defacing websites with threatening messages and unauthorized sales of stolen sensitive data, inducing widespread fear among Ukrainian citizens. Notably, personal health records were part of the exfiltrated information, compromising privacy on a large scale. The attacks not only disrupted Ukraine's digital infrastructure but also probed allied networks in NATO and the U.S., signifying a broader threat to international cybersecurity and stability.
Type: Wiper Attack
Attack Vector: WhisperGate MalwareWebsite Defacement
Threat Actor: Amin Timovich Stigal
Motivation: Destructive intent, inducing fear, and probing international networks
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Cyber Attack.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Wiper Attack UKR1011070724
Data Compromised: Personal health records, Sensitive data
Systems Affected: Government NetworksNon-Profit SectorIT Sector
Operational Impact: Systems became inoperable
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Health Records, Sensitive Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Wiper Attack UKR1011070724
Entity Name: Ukrainian Government
Entity Type: Government
Industry: Public Sector
Location: Ukraine
Incident : Wiper Attack UKR1011070724
Entity Name: Non-Profit Organizations
Entity Type: Non-Profit
Industry: Various
Location: Ukraine
Incident : Wiper Attack UKR1011070724
Entity Name: IT Sector
Entity Type: Corporate
Industry: Information Technology
Location: Ukraine
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Wiper Attack UKR1011070724
Type of Data Compromised: Personal health records, Sensitive data
Sensitivity of Data: High
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Amin Timovich Stigal.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personal Health Records, Sensitive Data and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Government NetworksNon-Profit SectorIT Sector.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Sensitive Data and Personal Health Records.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description
A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=ukrainian-bridge' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
