Comparison Overview

Ministry of Justice UK

VS

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Ministry of Justice UK

102 Petty France, None, London, None, GB, SW1H 9AJ
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 650 and 699

This is the official LinkedIn page of the UK Ministry of Justice. This page is not moderated. To find out more about our work follow us on: X at www.twitter.com/mojgovuk Facebook at www.facebook.com/ministryofjusticeuk Instagram at www.instagram.com/mojgovuk

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 19,528
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, US, 30333
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CDC works 24/7 keeping America safe from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and domestic. Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights it and supports communities and citizens to prevent it. CDC is the nation’s health protection agency - saving lives, protecting people from health threats, and saving money through prevention. For more information, please go to: http://www.cdc.gov/ Comment Policy: Please visit http://www.cdc.gov/SocialMedia/Tools/CommentPolicy.html to view CDC’s social media comment policy. Privacy Notice Regarding Third Party Websites: Privacy Notice: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention uses third-party Web sites to share information and to encourage collaboration with the public. Third-party Web sites are not Government-owned or Government-operated. They are controlled and operated by a third party not affiliated with CDC. The CDC Privacy Policy does not apply to third-party Web sites or applications. To learn more about CDC’s privacy practices, please visit our Privacy Policy at https://www.cdc.gov/other/privacy.html.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 20,033
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-ministry-of-justice.jpeg
Ministry of Justice UK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention.jpeg
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ministry of Justice UK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Ministry of Justice UK has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2025.

Incident History — Ministry of Justice UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ministry of Justice UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uk-ministry-of-justice.jpeg
Ministry of Justice UK
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: dark web exposure, weak/reused passwords
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention.jpeg
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ministry of Justice UK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ministry of Justice UK company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company.

In the current year, Ministry of Justice UK company has reported more cyber incidents than Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company.

Neither Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company nor Ministry of Justice UK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company and Ministry of Justice UK company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company nor Ministry of Justice UK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ministry of Justice UK company nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ministry of Justice UK nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ministry of Justice UK company.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company employs more people globally than Ministry of Justice UK company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Ministry of Justice UK nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ministry of Justice UK nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ministry of Justice UK nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ministry of Justice UK nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ministry of Justice UK nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ministry of Justice UK nor Centers for Disease Control and Prevention holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X