Comparison Overview
University of Florida - Warrington College of Business
University of Florida - Warrington College of Business
University of Florida, Gainesville, fl, 32611-7150, US
Last Update: 19/02/2026
The Warrington College of Business is one of the nation’s premier business schools. As a part of a Research 1 institution, Warrington is dedicated to an extensive research agenda in addition to cultivating the young minds of our future leaders of industry. The College i...
Nanyang Technological University Singapore
50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, Singapore, 639798, SG
Last Update: 02/04/2026
A research-intensive public university, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) has 33,000 undergraduate and postgraduate students in the Engineering, Business, Science, Medicine, Humanities, Arts, & Social Sciences, and Graduate colleges. NTU is ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
University of Florida - Warrington College of Business
Nanyang Technological University Singapore
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Florida - Warrington College of Business in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Nanyang Technological University Singapore in 2026.
Incident History - University of Florida - Warrington College of Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Florida - Warrington College of Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Nanyang Technological University Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nanyang Technological University Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
University of Florida - Warrington College of Business
Nanyang Technological University Singapore
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.