Comparison Overview

University of Florida

VS

University of Missouri-Columbia

University of Florida

355 Tigert Hall, Gainesville, Florida, US, 32611-3115
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://UF.edu

University of Florida is a major, public, comprehensive, land-grant, research university. The state's oldest, largest and most comprehensive university, it is among the nation's most academically diverse public universities. University of Florida has a long history of established programs in international education, research and service. It was founded in 1853 and is based in Gainesville, Florida.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 30,956
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

University of Missouri-Columbia

105 Jesse Hall, Columbia, MO, US, 65211
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 800 and 849
http://www.missouri.edu

We are Mizzou! Our distinct mission, as Missouri's only state-supported member of the Association of American Universities, is to provide all Missourians the benefits of a world-class research university. We are stewards and builders of a priceless state resource, a unique physical infrastructure and scholarly environment in which our tightly interlocked missions of teaching, research, service and economic development work together on behalf of all citizens. Students work side by side with some of the world's best faculty to advance the arts and humanities, the sciences, and the professions. Scholarship and teaching are daily driven by a sense of public service — the obligation to produce and disseminate knowledge that will improve the quality of life in the state, the nation and the world.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 14,645
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-missouri.jpeg
University of Missouri-Columbia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Florida
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Missouri-Columbia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Florida in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Missouri-Columbia in 2026.

Incident History — University of Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Missouri-Columbia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Missouri-Columbia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uflorida.jpeg
University of Florida
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-missouri.jpeg
University of Missouri-Columbia
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Florida company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Missouri-Columbia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Missouri-Columbia company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Florida company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Missouri-Columbia company and University of Florida company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Missouri-Columbia company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Missouri-Columbia company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Missouri-Columbia company nor University of Florida company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

University of Missouri-Columbia company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while University of Florida company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Missouri-Columbia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Florida company.

University of Florida company employs more people globally than University of Missouri-Columbia company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Florida nor University of Missouri-Columbia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References