Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UD Center for Global Programs and ServicesUD Center for Global Programs and Services
VS
The University of AlabamaThe University of Alabama
UD Center for Global Programs and Services

UD Center for Global Programs and Services

N/A

Last Update: 26/10/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://udel.edu/global
770/1000Fair

As the hub for UD Global, the Center for Global Programs & Services at the University of Delaware provides leadership and innovation in support of the University's global initiatives and campus internationalization efforts. CGPS is home to the operations of Study Abroad...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The University of Alabama

The University of Alabama

739 University Blvd, Tuscaloosa, al, US, 35487-0166

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ua.edu
797/1000Fair

The University of Alabama is a student-centered research university and an academic community committed to enhancing the quality of life for all through breakthrough research. Founded in 1831 as Alabama's first public college, The University of Alabama is dedicated to...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:12,997
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UD Center for Global Programs and Services

UD Center for Global Programs and Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The University of Alabama

The University of Alabama

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UD Center for Global Programs and Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Alabama in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UD Center for Global Programs and Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UD Center for Global Programs and Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The University of Alabama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Alabama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UD Center for Global Programs and Services

UD Center for Global Programs and Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The University of Alabama

The University of Alabama

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
THE15227323

FAQ

Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services company and The University of Alabama company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services and The University of Alabama, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services and The University of Alabama, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UD Center for Global Programs and Services or The University of Alabama ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UD Center for Global Programs and Services or The University of Alabama ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services and The University of Alabama, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UD Center for Global Programs and Services and The University of Alabama, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1