Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UCT LawUCT Law
VS
Universiti Teknologi MARAUniversiti Teknologi MARA
UCT Law

UCT Law

Kramer Building, Cross Campus Road, Rondebosch, Cape Town, 7700, ZA

Last Update: 10/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.law.uct.ac.za
771/1000Fair

UCT Law - the top Law school on the continent! We are home to internationally recognised experts in a wide range of legal specialisations, and are the destination for LLB and postgraduate coursework and research degrees. Our alumni are positively impacting the justice, ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Universiti Teknologi MARA

Universiti Teknologi MARA

Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, selangor, MY, 40450

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.uitm.edu.my
803/1000Good

Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) is the largest comprehensive university in Malaysia providing innovative education with state-of-the-art infrastructure and technology within reach at its 34 campuses (1 main campus, 12 state campuses and 21 satellite campuses), 4 Colleg...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:14,048
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UCT Law

UCT Law

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Universiti Teknologi MARA

Universiti Teknologi MARA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCT Law in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universiti Teknologi MARA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UCT Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCT Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Universiti Teknologi MARA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universiti Teknologi MARA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UCT Law

UCT Law

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Universiti Teknologi MARA

Universiti Teknologi MARA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UNI2141123

FAQ

Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UCT Law company and Universiti Teknologi MARA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UCT Law and Universiti Teknologi MARA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UCT Law and Universiti Teknologi MARA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UCT Law or Universiti Teknologi MARA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UCT Law or Universiti Teknologi MARA ?
Between UCT Law and Universiti Teknologi MARA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UCT Law and Universiti Teknologi MARA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2