Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer CenterUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
VS
Johnson & Johnson MedTechJohnson & Johnson MedTech
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

1825 4th St, San Francisco, 94158, US

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://cancer.ucsf.edu
762/1000Fair

The UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center combines basic science, clinical research, epidemiology/cancer control and patient care from throughout the University of California, San Francisco system. UCSF's long tradition of excellence in cancer research i...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:58
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

1 Johnson and Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, 08901

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
811/1000Good

At Johnson & Johnson MedTech, we are working to solve the world’s most pressing healthcare challenges through innovations at the intersection of biology and technology. With deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, cardiovascular, and vision, we design healthcare soluti...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:36,750
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson MedTech in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson & Johnson MedTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson MedTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA