Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UC Santa Cruz Social SciencesUC Santa Cruz Social Sciences
VS
George Mason UniversityGeorge Mason University
UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences

UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences

1156 High St, Santa Cruz, California, US, 95060

Last Update: 13/02/2026

View Profile
771/1000Fair

As social, economic, political, and technological changes transform global society, social scientists are tackling extremely complex issues, from racism, economic inequity, educational reform, and governance to environmental degradation, international trade and finance,...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:58
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
George Mason University

George Mason University

4400 University Drive, Fairfax, Virginia , US, 22030

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://gmu.edu
797/1000Fair

George Mason University is Virginia’s largest and most diverse public research university. Located near Washington, D.C., Mason enrolls more than 40,000 students from 130 countries and 50 states, and has a residential population of more than 6,000 students. Mason has gr...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,707
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences

UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
George Mason University

George Mason University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for George Mason University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - George Mason University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

George Mason University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences

UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
George Mason University

George Mason University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences company and George Mason University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences and George Mason University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences and George Mason University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences or George Mason University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences or George Mason University ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences and George Mason University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UC Santa Cruz Social Sciences and George Mason University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1