Comparison Overview
UC Santa Cruz Science

UC Santa Cruz Science
1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, 95064, US
Last Update: 08/05/2026
The University of California, Santa Cruz Science Division is a world-leading research university. We have a reputation for instigating some of humanity’s most high-impact discoveries and empowering students with immersive research experiences since 1965. As the largest...

University of Helsinki
Yliopistonkatu 4, Helsinki, FI, 00014
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Working for the world Science has the power to change the world. Join one of the best research universities in the world – an international community united through bold thinking, science, research, and learning, with over 30,000 students and 8,000 employees. We are ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UC Santa Cruz Science







University of Helsinki






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UC Santa Cruz Science in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Helsinki in 2026.
Incident History - UC Santa Cruz Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UC Santa Cruz Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Helsinki (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Helsinki cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UC Santa Cruz Science

University of Helsinki
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.