Comparison Overview
UC Santa Cruz Science

UC Santa Cruz Science
1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, 95064, US
Last Update: 08/05/2026
The University of California, Santa Cruz Science Division is a world-leading research university. We have a reputation for instigating some of humanity’s most high-impact discoveries and empowering students with immersive research experiences since 1965. As the largest...

Monash University
Monash University, Victoria, 3800, AU
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Monash University is Australia’s largest and most international university. Its extensive educational offering, delivered via our 10 faculties, includes undergraduate, postgraduate and research courses. Monash is a research-intensive university, known for some significa...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UC Santa Cruz Science







Monash University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UC Santa Cruz Science in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Monash University in 2026.
Incident History - UC Santa Cruz Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UC Santa Cruz Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Monash University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Monash University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UC Santa Cruz Science

Monash University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.