Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UC Santa BarbaraUC Santa Barbara
VS
Texas Tech UniversityTexas Tech University
UC Santa Barbara

UC Santa Barbara

UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, 93106, US

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ucsb.edu/
796/1000Fair

UC Santa Barbara is consistently recognized for excellence across broad fields of study. Set alongside the California coast, its dynamic environment inspires scholarly ambition and creativity. This page highlights UCSB achievements and discoveries as well as opportuniti...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,547
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Texas Tech University

Texas Tech University

2500 Broadway, Lubbock, Texas, 79409, tx, US, 79409-5005

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ttu.edu
732/1000Moderate

A new era of excellence is dawning at Texas Tech University as it stands on the cusp of being one of the nation's premier research institutions. Research and enrollment numbers are at record levels, which cement Texas Tech's commitment to attracting and retaining qualit...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,327
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UC Santa Barbara

UC Santa Barbara

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Texas Tech University

Texas Tech University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UC Santa Barbara in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Tech University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UC Santa Barbara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UC Santa Barbara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Texas Tech University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Tech University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UC Santa Barbara

UC Santa Barbara

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Texas Tech University

Texas Tech University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TEX000121824

FAQ

Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UC Santa Barbara company and Texas Tech University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UC Santa Barbara and Texas Tech University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UC Santa Barbara and Texas Tech University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UC Santa Barbara or Texas Tech University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UC Santa Barbara or Texas Tech University ?
Between UC Santa Barbara and Texas Tech University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UC Santa Barbara and Texas Tech University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA