Comparison Overview
College of Natural & Agricultural Sciences (CNAS)

College of Natural & Agricultural Sciences (CNAS)
900 University Avenue, Riverside, 92521, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
About CNAS The College of Natural and Agricultural Sciences(CNAS) is home to world-renowned scholars pursuing research that deepens our knowledge of the universe we live in and improves the quality of life for inhabitants of the state, the nation, and the world. Central...

Stanford University
450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, US, 94305
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Stanford University pursues its founding mission of research and education with a spirit of optimism and possibility. Stanford catalyzes discoveries, accelerates the human impact of its research, educates students in a culture of expansive inquiry and freedom of thought...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

College of Natural & Agricultural Sciences (CNAS)







Stanford University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for College of Natural & Agricultural Sciences (CNAS) in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Stanford University has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - College of Natural & Agricultural Sciences (CNAS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
College of Natural & Agricultural Sciences (CNAS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Stanford University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Stanford University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

College of Natural & Agricultural Sciences (CNAS)

Stanford University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.