Comparison Overview
Universidad de Chile

Universidad de Chile
Av. Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 1058, Diagonal Paraguay 265, Torre 15, Santiago, CL, 28330111
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Founded in 1842, the University of Chile is the main and oldest institution of higher education in the country, with a national and public character. Generating, developing, integrating and communicating knowledge in all the areas of knowledge and culture are the mis...

Washington State University
Pullman/Spokane/Tri-Cities/Vancouver/Everett/Global, Pullman/Spokane/Tri-Cities/Vancouver/Everett/Global, 99164, US
Last Update: 28/07/2026
Washington State University is a nationally recognized land-grant research university, founded in Pullman in 1890. WSU’s statewide system includes campuses in Pullman, Spokane, Everett, Tri-Cities and Vancouver, with extension and research offices in every county of the...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Universidad de Chile







Washington State University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Universidad de Chile in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Washington State University has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Universidad de Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Universidad de Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Washington State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Washington State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Universidad de Chile

Washington State University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.