Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UC Davis HealthUC Davis Health
VS
AscensionAscension
UC Davis Health

UC Davis Health

4301 X Street, Sacramento, CA, US, 95817

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://health.ucdavis.edu
732/1000Moderate

UC Davis Health is improving lives and transforming health care by providing excellent patient care, conducting groundbreaking research, fostering innovative, interprofessional education, and creating dynamic, productive partnerships with the community. The academic hea...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:9,311
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1
Ascension

Ascension

101 South Hanley Rd., St. Louis, 63105, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ascension.org/
100/1000Critical

Answering God's call to bring health, healing and hope to all. Ascension is one of the nation’s leading non-profit and Catholic health systems, with a Mission of delivering compassionate, personalized care to all, with special attention to those most vulnerable. In FY...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:66,548
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UC Davis Health

UC Davis Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ascension

Ascension

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UC Davis Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Ascension has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - UC Davis Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UC Davis Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ascension (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascension cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UC Davis Health

UC Davis Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UCD334072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
UCD556072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
UCD430072825
Ascension

Ascension

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ASC1773764792
🔒 Incident : Breach
ASC220051225
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ASC000032225

FAQ

Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UC Davis Health company and Ascension company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UC Davis Health and Ascension, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UC Davis Health and Ascension, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UC Davis Health or Ascension ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UC Davis Health or Ascension ?
Between UC Davis Health and Ascension, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UC Davis Health and Ascension, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA