Comparison Overview
Alibaba UC Ads

Alibaba UC Ads
No. 163, Pingyun Rd., Huangpu West Avenue,Tianhe Dist.,, Guangzhou, 510627, CN
Last Update: 30/03/2026
About UC Ads UC Ads, empowered by UCWeb and Alibaba, is a mobile marketing solutions provider. With its intelligent content marketing solutions, huge user base and advanced technologies, UC Ads is able to help clients across the globe to connect with the right audienc...

Fanatics
95 Morton St, New York, NY, US, 10014
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Fanatics is a leading global digital sports platform. We ignite the passions of global sports fans and maximize the presence and reach for our hundreds of sports partners globally by offering products and services across Fanatics Commerce, Fanatics Collectibles, and Fan...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Alibaba UC Ads







Fanatics






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Alibaba UC Ads in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fanatics in 2026.
Incident History - Alibaba UC Ads (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Alibaba UC Ads cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Fanatics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fanatics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Alibaba UC Ads

Fanatics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.