Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Ubuntu

Ubuntu Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

ubuntu.com

Ubuntu is a community developed operating system that is perfect for laptops, desktops and servers. Ubuntu is and always will be free of charge. You do not pay any licensing fees. You can download, use and share Ubuntu with your friends, family, school or business for absolutely nothing.


Ubuntu A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Ubuntu
Company Information
Website:http://www.ubuntu.com
Employees number:None
Number of followers:0
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:ubuntu.com
Ubuntu Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
UbuntuSoftware Development
Updated:
28/05/2026
754/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Ubuntu Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
UbuntuSoftware Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Ubuntu
UbuntuFair
Current Score
754Baa (FAIR)
01000
4 incidents
-4.33 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
755Before Incident
MAY 2026
758Before Incident
Vulnerability
14 May 2026Ubuntu
Debian, Ubuntu and Raspberry Pi OS: Critical Linux Kernel Flaw ‘ssh-keysign-pwn’ Exposes SSH Keys and Shadow Passwords

Critical Linux Kernel Flaw Exposes SSH Keys and Password Hashes (CVE-2026-46333)

754After Incident
CRITICAL-4
UBURASDEB1778919975
Critical Linux Kernel Flaw Exposes SSH Keys and Password Hashes A newly disclosed Linux kernel vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-46333 and dubbed "ssh-keysign-pwn," allows attackers to extract highly sensitive data including SSH private keys and password hashes from affected systems. The flaw stems from a race condition in the kernel’s ptrace access control logic, specifically within the `__ptrace_may_access()` function. ### How the Exploit Works The vulnerability arises when a privileged process (e.g., ssh-keysign or chage) shuts down. During this brief window, its memory context is cleared (mm = NULL), but its file descriptors remain open. An unprivileged local attacker can exploit this gap using `pidfd_getfd()` to steal these descriptors, bypassing intended permission checks. A proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit on GitHub demonstrates how attackers can repeatedly spawn processes to race against a privileged helper’s exit, successfully extracting file descriptors in 100–2000 attempts making it a practical threat. ### Impact & Risks - SSH Private Key Theft: Enables attackers to impersonate systems or users, conduct man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks, and move laterally across networks. - Password Hash Exposure: Full read access to `/etc/shadow`, allowing offline cracking of credentials. - Cascading Compromises: Since SSH keys are often reused, a single breach can lead to wider network access. ### Affected Systems The flaw impacts most Linux distributions running kernels before the May 14, 2026 patch, including: - Ubuntu - Debian - Arch Linux - CentOS - Raspberry Pi OS Given the vulnerability’s six-year existence, many long-term deployments remain exposed. ### Mitigation & Response - Apply kernel patches for CVE-2026-46333. - Rotate all SSH keys, particularly on critical systems. - Audit access to sensitive files like `/etc/shadow`. - Monitor for suspicious `ptrace` or `pidfd` system calls. - Restrict local user access where possible, as exploitation requires local presence. With a public PoC exploit already available, the risk of active exploitation in the wild is heightened, underscoring the urgency for remediation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Privilege Escalation
IMPACT
Data Compromised: SSH private keys, password hashes (/etc/shadow)Systems Affected: Linux systems running kernels before May 14, 2026 patchOperational Impact: Lateral movement, man-in-the-middle attacks, credential crackingIdentity Theft Risk: High (SSH key impersonation, password cracking)
DATA BREACH
SSH private keysPassword hashesSensitivity Of Data: High (SSH keys, password hashes)/etc/shadow
MAY 2026
763Before Incident
Vulnerability
07 May 2026Ubuntu
openSUSE, CentOS, AlmaLinux, Ubuntu and Fedora: Dirty Frag Linux Vulnerability Let Attackers Gain Root Privileges – PoC Released

Dirty Frag: New Linux Kernel LPE Vulnerability Grants Root Access Across Major Distros

758After Incident
CRITICAL-5
TUXOPEFEDTHEUBU1778214411
Dirty Frag: New Linux Kernel LPE Vulnerability Grants Root Access Across Major Distros A newly disclosed Linux kernel vulnerability, dubbed Dirty Frag, enables local privilege escalation (LPE) by chaining two page-cache write flaws xfrm-ESP Page-Cache Write and RxRPC Page-Cache Write to achieve root access on nearly all major Linux distributions. The exploit, publicly released on May 7, 2026, following an embargo break, leverages a deterministic logic flaw rather than race conditions, ensuring a high success rate without kernel panics. Discovered by security researcher Hyunwoo Kim (@v4bel), Dirty Frag exploits the kernel’s zero-copy send path, where `splice()` inserts a reference to a read-only page cache (e.g., `/etc/passwd` or `/usr/bin/su`) into the `frag` slot of a sender-side `sk_buff`. Receiver-side cryptographic operations then modify the page cache in-place, corrupting files even for unprivileged users. ### Exploit Mechanics 1. xfrm-ESP Variant: - Targets `esp_input()` in the IPsec ESP receive path, skipping buffer allocation checks (`skb_cow_data()`) for non-linear `skb`s. - Attackers use `XFRMA_REPLAY_ESN_VAL` to overwrite arbitrary bytes (e.g., `/usr/bin/su`) with a root-shell ELF, requiring user namespace creation (`unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER)`), which is blocked on some Ubuntu systems via AppArmor. 2. RxRPC Variant: - Exploits `rxkad_verify_packet_1()` to perform in-place decryption on the first 8 bytes of an RxRPC payload. - Attackers brute-force a session key to manipulate plaintext (e.g., emptying `/etc/passwd`’s password field), bypassing PAM authentication. This variant does not require namespace privileges but relies on the `rxrpc.ko` module, absent by default on RHEL but present on Ubuntu. Chaining both exploits ensures root access across distributions, with the PoC first attempting the ESP path before falling back to RxRPC if `unshare` fails. ### Affected Systems The vulnerabilities span nine years, with the ESP flaw introduced in January 2017 (commit `cac2661c53f3`) and the RxRPC flaw in June 2023 (commit `2dc334f1a63a`). Confirmed affected distributions include: - Ubuntu 24.04.4 (kernel 6.17.0-23) - RHEL 10.1 (kernel 6.12.0-124.49.1) - openSUSE Tumbleweed (kernel 7.0.2-1) - CentOS Stream 10, AlmaLinux 10, Fedora 44 ### Patches & Mitigation - The ESP patch, using `SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG` to enforce buffer isolation, was merged into the netdev tree on May 7, 2026. - The RxRPC patch remains unmerged upstream. - No CVEs have been assigned due to the premature embargo break. - Temporary mitigation involves blacklisting the affected modules (`esp4`, `esp6`, `rxrpc`) via: ```bash sh -c "printf 'install esp4 /bin/false\ninstall esp6 /bin/false\ninstall rxrpc /bin/false\n' > /etc/modprobe.d/dirtyfrag.conf; rmmod esp4 esp6 rxrpc 2>/dev/null; true" ``` This disrupts IPsec and RxRPC functionality, requiring careful evaluation for systems reliant on VPNs. The full technical write-up and PoC are available on the researcher’s GitHub repository.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Local Privilege Escalation (LPE)
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Root access compromise on affected Linux distributionsOperational Impact: Potential unauthorized root access, system compromise, and data manipulation
DATA BREACH
/etc/passwd/usr/bin/su
APRIL 2026
767Before Incident
Vulnerability
22 Apr 2026Ubuntu
Debian, Fedora and Ubuntu: Critical Pack2TheRoot Vulnerability Let Attackers Gain Root Access or Compromise the System

High-Severity Linux Privilege Escalation Flaw 'Pack2TheRoot' Disclosed

763After Incident
CRITICAL-4
DEBUBUFED1776933436
High-Severity Linux Privilege Escalation Flaw "Pack2TheRoot" Disclosed Deutsche Telekom’s Red Team has publicly disclosed a high-severity privilege escalation vulnerability, CVE-2026-41651 (CVSS 8.8), dubbed Pack2TheRoot, affecting default installations of major Linux distributions. The flaw, present in the PackageKit daemon a widely used package management abstraction layer allows any local unprivileged user to silently install or remove system packages, ultimately gaining full root access without authentication. The vulnerability impacts PackageKit versions 1.0.2 through 1.3.4, spanning over 12 years of releases and exposing systems across Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, and Red Hat-based distributions, including enterprise servers running Cockpit. Confirmed vulnerable default installations include: - Ubuntu Desktop (18.04, 24.04.4 LTS, 26.04 LTS Beta) - Ubuntu Server (22.04, 24.04 LTS) - Debian Desktop (Trixie 13.4) - Rocky Linux Desktop (10.1) - Fedora (43 Desktop and Server) Exploitation is straightforward: an attacker with basic local access can bypass authorization controls, install malicious packages, or remove critical security components. A proof-of-concept (PoC) exists, reliably achieving root code execution in seconds, though it remains undisclosed. The flaw was discovered during Telekom Security’s research into local privilege escalation vectors, with Claude Opus (Anthropic) assisting in the investigation starting in 2025. Findings were responsibly disclosed to PackageKit maintainers, who confirmed the issue and its exploitability. While the attack leaves detectable traces such as PackageKit daemon crashes logged in *journalctl* systems can be checked for vulnerability using: - Debian/Ubuntu: `dpkg -l | grep -i packagekit` - RPM-based: `rpm -qa | grep -i packagekit` - Daemon status: `systemctl status packagekit` or `pkmon` A patch was released in PackageKit 1.3.5 (April 22, 2026), with distribution-specific fixes available via: - Debian: [security-tracker.debian.org](https://security-tracker.debian.org) - Ubuntu: Launchpad CVE tracker - Fedora: PackageKit-1.3.4-3 (via Koji) Administrators are advised to apply updates immediately, particularly on internet-facing servers running Cockpit.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Privilege Escalation
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Default installations of major Linux distributions (Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Rocky Linux, Red Hat-based)Operational Impact: Full root access compromise, potential installation/removal of malicious packages or critical security components
APRIL 2026
749Before Incident
Vulnerability
01 Apr 2026Ubuntu
Ubuntu: Wide-ranging 7-zip vulnerability with 8.8 CVE rating allows for code execution — hundreds of millions of machines potentially at risk

Critical 7-Zip Vulnerability Exposes Millions of Systems to Remote Code Execution

767After Incident
CRITICAL-18
UBU1779978504
Critical 7-Zip Vulnerability Exposes Millions of Systems to Remote Code Execution A high-severity vulnerability (CVE-2024-, rated 8.8) in the widely used open-source utility 7-Zip has been disclosed, allowing attackers to execute malicious code simply by tricking users into opening a crafted archive. The flaw affects all versions prior to 26.01, released in late April, and requires no further interaction merely opening a booby-trapped file (.7z, .zip, .rar, or even disguised NTFS disk images) on a system with at least 16 GB of RAM* is sufficient for exploitation. The impact is severe due to 7-Zip’s ubiquity. Beyond the Windows GUI application, command-line variants across multiple operating systems including Linux distributions with outdated p7zip ports are vulnerable. Millions of CI/CD pipelines, automated scripts, and server processes that interact with archives (even just to list contents) are at risk. With over 400 million downloads on SourceForge and 24.5 million via Chocolatey, plus widespread inclusion in Linux servers, VMs, and Docker images, the potential attack surface spans hundreds of millions of machines. The vulnerability extends further due to 7-Zip’s integration into third-party software. Antivirus scanners, backup tools, log analyzers, file managers, and malware sandboxes often embed 7-Zip’s libraries, many of which run with elevated permissions. Exploitation requires no user interaction in these cases, enabling drive-by attacks via poisoned archives. The flaw stems from a bug in 7-Zip’s handling of NTFS disk images, where an attacker can manipulate buffer values to trigger arbitrary code execution. Notably, 7-Zip ignores file extensions, relying instead on file headers meaning malicious NTFS images can be hidden within standard archive formats. Testing confirms vulnerable versions are present in Ubuntu 24/26, RHEL 8, Fedora, and many OEM systems that bundle 7-Zip by default. Without built-in update mechanisms, mitigation depends on manual upgrades or package manager updates.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
IMPACT
Systems Affected: Hundreds of millions of machines (Windows, Linux, CI/CD pipelines, servers, VMs, Docker images)Operational Impact: Potential compromise of automated scripts, server processes, and third-party software embedding 7-Zip libraries
MARCH 2026
749Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
749Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
749Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
749Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
749Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
749Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
749Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
749Before Incident
JULY 2025
749Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Ubuntu ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Ubuntu's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Ubuntu ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Ubuntu's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?