Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UBS key4 mortgagesUBS key4 mortgages
VS
SberbankSberbank
UBS key4 mortgages

UBS key4 mortgages

Zurich, CH

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://key4.ch/de/
771/1000Fair

Anstatt aufwändig Angebote einzuholen, lassen Sie mit UBS key4 mortgages die Anbieter einfach zu Ihnen kommen: Mit wenigen Klicks erhalten Sie sofort unverbindliche Angebote verschiedener Schweizer Anbieter. Transparent, unabhängig, individuell und natürlich kostenlos.

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sberbank

Sberbank

RU

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://sber.ru
822/1000Good

Сбер — крупнейший банк в России, поставщик надёжных технологических решений и один из ведущих финансовых институтов страны. Мы не боимся меняться и открывать новые горизонты, но в то же время остаёмся верными принципам, сформированным за нашу 180-летнюю историю. Такой п...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:11,105
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UBS key4 mortgages

UBS key4 mortgages

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sberbank

Sberbank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UBS key4 mortgages in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sberbank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UBS key4 mortgages (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UBS key4 mortgages cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sberbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sberbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UBS key4 mortgages

UBS key4 mortgages

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sberbank

Sberbank

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages company and Sberbank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages and Sberbank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages and Sberbank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UBS key4 mortgages or Sberbank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UBS key4 mortgages or Sberbank ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages and Sberbank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UBS key4 mortgages and Sberbank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA