Comparison Overview
UBS Global Wealth Management

UBS Global Wealth Management
Bahnhofstrasse 45, Zurich, CH
Last Update: 19/03/2026
With UBS, you’ll benefit from over 160 years of experience helping our clients pursue what matters most to them – in life and in business. We’ll get to know you and what you want to achieve, then craft personalized financial solutions that help protect and grow your we...

BNP Paribas
16 boulevard des Italiens, Paris, FR, 75009
Last Update: 28/03/2026
BNP Paribas is a leading bank in Europe with an international reach. It has a presence in 64 countries, with more than 178,000 employees, including more than 144,000 in Europe. BNP Paribas holds leading positions in its three major operating divisions: ⚆ Commercial, P...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UBS Global Wealth Management







BNP Paribas






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UBS Global Wealth Management in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BNP Paribas in 2026.
Incident History - UBS Global Wealth Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UBS Global Wealth Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BNP Paribas (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BNP Paribas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UBS Global Wealth Management

BNP Paribas
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.