Comparison Overview

UBS Asset Management

VS

Lars Larsen Group

UBS Asset Management

Europaallee 21, Zurich, 8004, CH
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.ubs.com/am

UBS Asset Management is a large-scale investment manager with a presence in 23 markets. We offer investment capabilities and investment styles across all major traditional and alternative asset classes, from active to passive including a comprehensive sustainable investing offering to: - Institutions - Wholesale intermediaries - Wealth management clients Follow our LinkedIn channel to stay up-to-date with key investment themes, all with the goal of bringing you the ideas, understanding and clarity to help you deliver your investment priorities and your values. www.ubs.com/social-legal

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Lars Larsen Group

Randersvej 2.c, 8600 Silkeborg, DK
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.larslarsengroup.com

Lars Larsen Group is owned by the Brunsborg family, descendants of JYSK founder Lars Larsen. The Group owns companies within a number of business areas including furniture, interior design, restaurants and hotels, and is also an active investor in equities, funds, and real estate. The Group is to this day operated in accordance with the family’s fundamental values of tradesmanship, responsibility and growth.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 16,177
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ubs-asset-management.jpeg
UBS Asset Management
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larslarsengroup.jpeg
Lars Larsen Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UBS Asset Management
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lars Larsen Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UBS Asset Management in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lars Larsen Group in 2026.

Incident History — UBS Asset Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UBS Asset Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lars Larsen Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lars Larsen Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ubs-asset-management.jpeg
UBS Asset Management
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Third-party supplier compromise
Motivation: Data exfiltration and potential ransom demand
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Cyber Attack on Third-Party Vendor
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/larslarsengroup.jpeg
Lars Larsen Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lars Larsen Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UBS Asset Management company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UBS Asset Management company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lars Larsen Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lars Larsen Group company and UBS Asset Management company have not reported any cyber incidents.

UBS Asset Management company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Lars Larsen Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

UBS Asset Management company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lars Larsen Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lars Larsen Group company nor UBS Asset Management company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UBS Asset Management company nor Lars Larsen Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UBS Asset Management nor Lars Larsen Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lars Larsen Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UBS Asset Management company.

Lars Larsen Group company employs more people globally than UBS Asset Management company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither UBS Asset Management nor Lars Larsen Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UBS Asset Management nor Lars Larsen Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UBS Asset Management nor Lars Larsen Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UBS Asset Management nor Lars Larsen Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UBS Asset Management nor Lars Larsen Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UBS Asset Management nor Lars Larsen Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References