Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Beesafe sp. z o.o.Beesafe sp. z o.o.
VS
SedgwickSedgwick
Beesafe sp. z o.o.

Beesafe sp. z o.o.

Aleje Jerozolimskie 181 b, Warszawa, 02-222, PL

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://beesafe.pl
751/1000Fair

Beesafe to marka ubezpieczeniowa z internetowym charakterem. To co nas wyróżnia, to unikalne produkty ubezpieczeniowe oraz użyteczne usługi, z których chce się korzystać. Co więcej, każda zakupiona polisa i każdy dzień z nami zbliża Cię do zdobycia nagród dostarczanych ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:69
Subsidiaries:42
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sedgwick

Sedgwick

US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.sedgwick.com
673/1000Weak

Sedgwick is the world’s leading risk and claims administration partner, helping clients thrive by navigating the unexpected. The company’s expertise, combined with the most advanced AI-enabled technology available, sets the standard for solutions in claims administratio...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:22,216
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Beesafe sp. z o.o.

Beesafe sp. z o.o.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sedgwick

Sedgwick

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Beesafe sp. z o.o. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sedgwick in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Beesafe sp. z o.o. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Beesafe sp. z o.o. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sedgwick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sedgwick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Beesafe sp. z o.o.

Beesafe sp. z o.o.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sedgwick

Sedgwick

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SEDSED1767602047
🔒 Incident : Breach
SED549072725

FAQ

Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. company and Sedgwick company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. and Sedgwick, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. and Sedgwick, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Beesafe sp. z o.o. or Sedgwick ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Beesafe sp. z o.o. or Sedgwick ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. and Sedgwick, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Beesafe sp. z o.o. and Sedgwick, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1