Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Uber FreightUber Freight
VS
CMA CGMCMA CGM
Uber Freight

Uber Freight

433 W Van Buren St, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60607

Last Update: 12/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.uberfreight.com/
754/1000Fair

Powering Intelligent Logistics

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:6,155
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
CMA CGM

CMA CGM

4, Quai d'arenc, Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, FR, 13002

Last Update: 18/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cma-cgm.com
774/1000Fair

The CMA CGM Group is a global player in sea, land, air and logistics solutions, true to its corporate Purpose, "We imagine better ways to serve a world in motion". Present in 177 countries, it employs 160,000 people, of which nearly 6,000 in Marseilles where its head o...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:32,784
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Uber Freight

Uber Freight

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CMA CGM

CMA CGM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

Uber Freight has 43.88% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CMA CGM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Uber Freight (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Uber Freight cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CMA CGM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CMA CGM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Uber Freight

Uber Freight

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UBE1786568682
🔒 Incident : Breach
APOLEVNEU1787336860
CMA CGM

CMA CGM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CMA330092125
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CMA642092025
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CMA840092125

FAQ

Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Uber Freight company and CMA CGM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Uber Freight and CMA CGM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Uber Freight and CMA CGM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Uber Freight or CMA CGM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Uber Freight or CMA CGM ?
Between Uber Freight and CMA CGM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Uber Freight and CMA CGM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2