Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UBCIUBCI
VS
Intesa SanpaoloIntesa Sanpaolo
UBCI

UBCI

139, AVENUE DE LA LIBERTE 1002 TUNIS, tunis, 1002, TN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ubci.tn
759/1000Fair

Née en 1961, l’UBCI dispose aujourd’hui d’un réseau de 102 Agences et 117 GAB opérant au cœur même des principaux centres économiques de la Tunisie. L’UBCI offre une large gamme de produits et de services à l'attention de sa Clientèle de Particuliers et de Professionne...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:1,014
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Intesa Sanpaolo

Intesa Sanpaolo

Piazza San Carlo 156, Turin, TO, IT, 10121

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
624/1000Poor

Intesa Sanpaolo è il maggior gruppo bancario in Italia con una significativa presenza internazionale. Il suo business model distintivo la rende leader a livello europeo nel Wealth Management, Protection & Advisory e ne caratterizza l’orientamento al digitale. I’impegno ...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:54,522
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UBCI

UBCI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Intesa Sanpaolo

Intesa Sanpaolo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UBCI in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Intesa Sanpaolo has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - UBCI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UBCI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Intesa Sanpaolo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intesa Sanpaolo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UBCI

UBCI

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Intesa Sanpaolo

Intesa Sanpaolo

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
INT1774888779
🔒 Incident : Breach
INTYAHIAB1766434075
🔒 Incident : Breach
INT1774895581

FAQ

Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UBCI company and Intesa Sanpaolo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UBCI and Intesa Sanpaolo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UBCI and Intesa Sanpaolo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UBCI or Intesa Sanpaolo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UBCI or Intesa Sanpaolo ?
Between UBCI and Intesa Sanpaolo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UBCI and Intesa Sanpaolo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2