Comparison Overview
University of Arizona Health Sciences
University of Arizona Health Sciences
Health Sciences Innovation Building (HSIB), Tucson, 85721, US
Last Update: 15/12/2025
The University of Arizona Health Sciences reaches across the state and well beyond its borders to provide health-care education, research, patient care and service for Arizonans and their neighbors. Arizona’s only academic health center, UArizona Health Sciences is ba...
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Administration Bldg Suite 1070, BIRMINGHAM, 35294-0110, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Known for its innovative and interdisciplinary approach to education at both the graduate and undergraduate levels, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a part of the University of Alabama System, is an internationally renowned research university and academic medic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
University of Arizona Health Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Arizona Health Sciences in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2026.
Incident History - University of Arizona Health Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Arizona Health Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Alabama at Birmingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Alabama at Birmingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
University of Arizona Health Sciences
University of Alabama at Birmingham
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.
WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.
Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.
Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.