Comparison Overview
St. Vincent’s Health System
St. Vincent’s Health System
810 St. Vincent's Drive, Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, US
Last Update: 02/01/2026
UAB St. Vincent’s is committed to delivering compassionate, personalized care to every patient. Our dedication to patients and their families begins with the exceptional doctors, nurses, and care teams who work in our hospitals and care sites across Alabama.
MultiCare Health System
315 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, Tacoma, WA, US, 98415
Last Update: 03/09/2026
MultiCare’s roots in the Pacific Northwest go back to 1882, with the founding of Tacoma’s first hospital. Over the years, we’ve grown from a Tacoma-centric, hospital-based organization into the largest, community-based, locally governed health system in the state of Wa...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
St. Vincent’s Health System
MultiCare Health System
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for St. Vincent’s Health System in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for MultiCare Health System in 2026.
Incident History - St. Vincent’s Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)
St. Vincent’s Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - MultiCare Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)
MultiCare Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
St. Vincent’s Health System
MultiCare Health System
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.