Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UAB College of Arts & SciencesUAB College of Arts & Sciences
VS
RMIT UniversityRMIT University
UAB College of Arts & Sciences

UAB College of Arts & Sciences

1401 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, US

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.uab.edu/cas/home
768/1000Fair

Our distinctive combination of strong academic programs, outstanding teaching, and a diverse student body nestled in the historic and vibrant city of Birmingham make the UAB College of Arts and Sciences a unique destination for those seeking excellence in education, res...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:22
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
RMIT University

RMIT University

124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, 3000, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.rmit.edu.au
805/1000Good

RMIT is a global university of technology, design and enterprise. One of Australia's original tertiary institutions, RMIT University enjoys an international reputation for excellence in professional and vocational education, applied research, and engagement with the ne...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:14,132
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UAB College of Arts & Sciences

UAB College of Arts & Sciences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RMIT University

RMIT University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UAB College of Arts & Sciences in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RMIT University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UAB College of Arts & Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UAB College of Arts & Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RMIT University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RMIT University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UAB College of Arts & Sciences

UAB College of Arts & Sciences

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
RMIT University

RMIT University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences company and RMIT University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences and RMIT University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences and RMIT University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UAB College of Arts & Sciences or RMIT University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UAB College of Arts & Sciences or RMIT University ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences and RMIT University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UAB College of Arts & Sciences and RMIT University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2