Comparison Overview
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy
1716 9th Ave S, Birmingham, 35205, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The UAB Department of Physical Therapy is a nationally recognized leader in education, research, and clinical practice. With more than 50 years of excellence, the department is committed to preparing the next generation of physical therapists, researchers, and leaders d...

Penn State University
201 Old Main, University Park, pa, US, 16802-1589
Last Update: 02/04/2026
There’s a reason Penn State consistently ranks among the top one percent of the world’s universities. Across 24 campuses, our nearly 88,000 students and 17,000 faculty and staff know the real measure of success goes beyond the classroom—it’s the positive impact made on ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UAB Department of Physical Therapy







Penn State University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UAB Department of Physical Therapy in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Penn State University in 2026.
Incident History - UAB Department of Physical Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UAB Department of Physical Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Penn State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Penn State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

Penn State University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.