Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UAB Department of Physical TherapyUAB Department of Physical Therapy
VS
Penn State UniversityPenn State University
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

1716 9th Ave S, Birmingham, 35205, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.uab.edu/shp/pt/
771/1000Fair

The UAB Department of Physical Therapy is a nationally recognized leader in education, research, and clinical practice. With more than 50 years of excellence, the department is committed to preparing the next generation of physical therapists, researchers, and leaders d...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Penn State University

Penn State University

201 Old Main, University Park, pa, US, 16802-1589

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://psu.edu
817/1000Good

There’s a reason Penn State consistently ranks among the top one percent of the world’s universities. Across 24 campuses, our nearly 88,000 students and 17,000 faculty and staff know the real measure of success goes beyond the classroom—it’s the positive impact made on ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:31,777
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Penn State University

Penn State University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UAB Department of Physical Therapy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Penn State University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UAB Department of Physical Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UAB Department of Physical Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Penn State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Penn State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Penn State University

Penn State University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Penn State University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and Penn State University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and Penn State University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UAB Department of Physical Therapy or Penn State University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UAB Department of Physical Therapy or Penn State University ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and Penn State University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and Penn State University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3