Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UAB Department of Physical TherapyUAB Department of Physical Therapy
VS
North Carolina State UniversityNorth Carolina State University
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

1716 9th Ave S, Birmingham, 35205, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.uab.edu/shp/pt/
771/1000Fair

The UAB Department of Physical Therapy is a nationally recognized leader in education, research, and clinical practice. With more than 50 years of excellence, the department is committed to preparing the next generation of physical therapists, researchers, and leaders d...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
North Carolina State University

North Carolina State University

20 Watauga Club Dr, Raleigh, North Carolina, US, 27607

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://ncsu.edu
805/1000Good

With more than 34,000 students and 7,000 faculty and staff, North Carolina State University is a comprehensive university known for its leadership in education and research, and globally recognized for its science, technology, engineering and mathematics leadership. ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:20,639
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
North Carolina State University

North Carolina State University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UAB Department of Physical Therapy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Carolina State University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UAB Department of Physical Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UAB Department of Physical Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - North Carolina State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Carolina State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
North Carolina State University

North Carolina State University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and North Carolina State University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and North Carolina State University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and North Carolina State University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UAB Department of Physical Therapy or North Carolina State University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UAB Department of Physical Therapy or North Carolina State University ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and North Carolina State University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and North Carolina State University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8