Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UAB Department of Physical TherapyUAB Department of Physical Therapy
VS
Lund UniversityLund University
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

1716 9th Ave S, Birmingham, 35205, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.uab.edu/shp/pt/
771/1000Fair

The UAB Department of Physical Therapy is a nationally recognized leader in education, research, and clinical practice. With more than 50 years of excellence, the department is committed to preparing the next generation of physical therapists, researchers, and leaders d...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lund University

Lund University

Lund University, Box 117, Lund, SE, 221 00

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
796/1000Fair

Lund University has around 46 000 students and 8 600 staff based in Lund, Helsingborg and Malmö. We are united in our efforts to understand, explain and improve our world and the human condition. Lund is considered one of the most popular study locations in Sweden. The...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,054
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lund University

Lund University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UAB Department of Physical Therapy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lund University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UAB Department of Physical Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UAB Department of Physical Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lund University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lund University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lund University

Lund University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy company and Lund University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and Lund University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and Lund University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UAB Department of Physical Therapy or Lund University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UAB Department of Physical Therapy or Lund University ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and Lund University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UAB Department of Physical Therapy and Lund University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9