Comparison Overview
UAB Department of Physical Therapy

UAB Department of Physical Therapy
1716 9th Ave S, Birmingham, 35205, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The UAB Department of Physical Therapy is a nationally recognized leader in education, research, and clinical practice. With more than 50 years of excellence, the department is committed to preparing the next generation of physical therapists, researchers, and leaders d...

Lund University
Lund University, Box 117, Lund, SE, 221 00
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Lund University has around 46 000 students and 8 600 staff based in Lund, Helsingborg and Malmö. We are united in our efforts to understand, explain and improve our world and the human condition. Lund is considered one of the most popular study locations in Sweden. The...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

UAB Department of Physical Therapy







Lund University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UAB Department of Physical Therapy in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lund University in 2026.
Incident History - UAB Department of Physical Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UAB Department of Physical Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lund University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lund University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

UAB Department of Physical Therapy

Lund University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.