Comparison Overview

UAB Medicine

VS

Oregon Health & Science University

UAB Medicine

1802 6th Ave S, Birmingham, Alabama, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

As a nationally ranked academic medical center and one of Alabama’s largest employers, UAB Medicine is about teamwork, support, mentorship, and collaboration. Employees are empowered to lead, learn, and innovate as they deliver world-class care to every patient, every family, every time. When you are a part of UAB Medicine, you change the world - starting with you. What happens here? • 1,100+ patient bed facility caring for 60,000+ each year • Level I Trauma Center and an ER the size of a football field • 9 speciality Intensive Care Units, including a Level IV Regional Neonatal ICU • Alabama’s first Comprehensive Stroke Center • First Magnet Hospital in Alabama and the only one in our state Why work at UAB Medicine? • Excellent benefits package: 100% tuition assistance, paid parental leave for moms and dads, professional development opportunities • Named among the “150 Best Places to Work in Healthcare” and "100 Great Hospitals in America"​ by Becker's Hospital Review • Ranked among the best by U.S. News & World Report year after year • Rated in the top 25 by Forbes for “Best Midsized Employer” Our website is a great career resource- be sure to check it out! www.uabmedicine.org/careers

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,600
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Oregon Health & Science University

3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon, 97239, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

At OHSU, we deliver breakthroughs for better health. We're driven by the belief that better health starts with innovations in the lab, in the classroom, at the bedside and in our communities. From cancer to Alzheimer's to cardiovascular care, we collaborate every day to identify and deliver new ways to understand disease, treat illness and train the next generation of scientists and health professionals. It takes all of us - from scientists, clinicians and nurses to a top-notch professional staff. Join us.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 16,777
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uab-medicine.jpeg
UAB Medicine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohsu.jpeg
Oregon Health & Science University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UAB Medicine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oregon Health & Science University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UAB Medicine in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oregon Health & Science University in 2025.

Incident History — UAB Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UAB Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oregon Health & Science University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oregon Health & Science University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uab-medicine.jpeg
UAB Medicine
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ohsu.jpeg
Oregon Health & Science University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Oregon Health & Science University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to UAB Medicine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UAB Medicine company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Oregon Health & Science University company has not reported any.

In the current year, Oregon Health & Science University company and UAB Medicine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oregon Health & Science University company nor UAB Medicine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

UAB Medicine company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Oregon Health & Science University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Oregon Health & Science University company nor UAB Medicine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UAB Medicine company nor Oregon Health & Science University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UAB Medicine nor Oregon Health & Science University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Oregon Health & Science University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UAB Medicine company.

Oregon Health & Science University company employs more people globally than UAB Medicine company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither UAB Medicine nor Oregon Health & Science University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UAB Medicine nor Oregon Health & Science University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UAB Medicine nor Oregon Health & Science University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UAB Medicine nor Oregon Health & Science University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UAB Medicine nor Oregon Health & Science University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UAB Medicine nor Oregon Health & Science University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H