Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

UAB - Facultat de DretUAB - Facultat de Dret
VS
USP - Universidade de São PauloUSP - Universidade de São Paulo
UAB - Facultat de Dret

UAB - Facultat de Dret

N/A

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uab.cat/dret
770/1000Fair

La Facultat de Dret de la UAB, amb més de 40 anys d’existència, inicia aquest curs acadèmic amb l’objectiu de seguir consolidant l’excel·lència que ja ens reconeixen a nivell nacional i internacional.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
USP - Universidade de São Paulo

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

Rua da Reitoria, 109, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 05508-900

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.usp.br/
818/1000Good

A Universidade de São Paulo (USP) é uma universidade pública, mantida pelo Estado de São Paulo e ligada à Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Econômico, Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (SDECTI). O talento e dedicação dos docentes, alunos e funcionários têm sido reconhecidos po...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:22,604
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
UAB - Facultat de Dret

UAB - Facultat de Dret

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
USP - Universidade de São Paulo

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UAB - Facultat de Dret in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USP - Universidade de São Paulo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - UAB - Facultat de Dret (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UAB - Facultat de Dret cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - USP - Universidade de São Paulo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USP - Universidade de São Paulo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
UAB - Facultat de Dret

UAB - Facultat de Dret

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
USP - Universidade de São Paulo

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret and USP - Universidade de São Paulo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret and USP - Universidade de São Paulo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - UAB - Facultat de Dret or USP - Universidade de São Paulo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - UAB - Facultat de Dret or USP - Universidade de São Paulo ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret and USP - Universidade de São Paulo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between UAB - Facultat de Dret and USP - Universidade de São Paulo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1