Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. Embassy in MexicoU.S. Embassy in Mexico
VS
United States Postal ServiceUnited States Postal Service
U.S. Embassy in Mexico

U.S. Embassy in Mexico

Paseo de la Reforma 305, Delegacion Cuauhtemoc, 06500, MX

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

Welcome to the LinkedIn page of the US Embassy in Mexico, incorporating the US Embassy in Mexico City, our 9 consulates and our 9 consular agencies. The US Ambassador to Mexico is Christopher Landau.

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:270
Subsidiaries:75
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
United States Postal Service

United States Postal Service

475 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, D.C., US, 20260

Last Update: 02/08/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.usps.com/
672/1000Weak

As the United States Postal Service continues its evolution as a forward-thinking, fast-acting company capable of providing quality products and services for its customers, it continues to remember and celebrate its roots as the first national network of communications ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:160,918
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. Embassy in Mexico

U.S. Embassy in Mexico

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
United States Postal Service

United States Postal Service

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Embassy in Mexico in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

United States Postal Service has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. Embassy in Mexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Embassy in Mexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - United States Postal Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Postal Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. Embassy in Mexico

U.S. Embassy in Mexico

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
United States Postal Service

United States Postal Service

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
USP1776349784
🔒 Incident : Breach
USP853052025
🔒 Incident : Breach
USP001081724

FAQ

Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico company and United States Postal Service company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico and United States Postal Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico and United States Postal Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. Embassy in Mexico or United States Postal Service ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. Embassy in Mexico or United States Postal Service ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico and United States Postal Service, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. Embassy in Mexico and United States Postal Service, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86150
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. Impacted is an unknown function of the file custom-x/softap/hostapd. Such manipulation of the argument wpa_passphrase leads to hard-coded credentials. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86149
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file Net/NetCheckPing.cpp. This manipulation of the argument interface_name/host causes os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86148
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This vulnerability affects the function SystemAsh of the file Apis/system.c of the component Kylin. The manipulation of the argument AlarmVoiceURL results in os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86206
SUMMARY

A vulnerability in the N-central internal API access control filter allows unauthorised access to internal APIs. This is fixed in N-central 2026.3 HF3 and 2026.4

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86060
SUMMARY

RouterOS contains an argument-handling flaw in the SSH login path involving usernames that begin with a prohibited character, allowing for the trusted RouterOS policy mask to be changed, leading to privilege escalation. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated SSH session to reach the RouterOS login helper.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA