Comparison Overview

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

VS

New York City Police Department

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

Washington, 20536, US
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 550 and 599

Protects America through criminal investigations and by enforcing immigration law to preserve national security and public safety. Privacy: http://go.dhs.gov/UC8 https://go.dhs.gov/lapse-2025

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 1,791
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
5

New York City Police Department

One Police Plaza, New York, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 700 and 749

Welcome to the Official NYPD LinkedIn Page. For emergencies, dial 911. To submit crime tips & information, visit www.NYPDcrimestoppers.com or call 800-577-TIPS. The mission of the New York City Police Department is to enhance the quality of life in New York City by working in partnership with the community to enforce the law, preserve peace, protect the people, reduce fear, and maintain order. The New York City Police Department strives to foster a safe and fair City by incorporating Neighborhood Policing into all facets of Department operations, and solve the problems that create crime and disorder through an interdependent relationship between the people and its police, and by pioneering strategic innovation.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 13,804
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/u-s-immigration-and-customs-enforcement-ice.jpeg
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-police-department.jpeg
New York City Police Department
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New York City Police Department
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has 11.11% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New York City Police Department in 2026.

Incident History — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New York City Police Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New York City Police Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/u-s-immigration-and-customs-enforcement-ice.jpeg
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Whistleblower Leak
Motivation: Accountability for law enforcement actions, reform of ICE and CBP
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)
Motivation: Suppression of leaked data
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Brute-force attacks, Password spraying, MFA fatigue (push bombing)
Motivation: Retaliation for U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, Financial gain (ransomware payments), Political/ideological (anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-york-city-police-department.jpeg
New York City Police Department
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2019
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Infected NUC mini-PC plugged in by a contractor
Blog: Blog

FAQ

New York City Police Department company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to New York City Police Department company.

In the current year, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has reported more cyber incidents than New York City Police Department company.

Both New York City Police Department company and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other New York City Police Department company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while New York City Police Department company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while New York City Police Department company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor New York City Police Department holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to New York City Police Department company.

New York City Police Department company employs more people globally than U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) company, reflecting its scale as a Law Enforcement.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor New York City Police Department holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor New York City Police Department holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor New York City Police Department holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor New York City Police Department holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor New York City Police Department holds HIPAA certification.

Neither U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nor New York City Police Department holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H