Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)
VS
Social Security AdministrationSocial Security Administration
U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

7115 South Boundary Boulevard , 33621-5101, Tampa, 33621-5101, US

Last Update: 01/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.centcom.mil
735/1000Moderate

USCENTCOM is a unified combatant command of the United States Department of Defense. Our mission is to direct and enable military operations and activities with allies and partners to increase regional security and stability in support of enduring U.S. interests. The U...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:331
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Social Security Administration

Social Security Administration

6401 Security Blvd, Baltimore, 21235, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
474/1000Critical

Social Security provides financial protection for our nation’s people, supporting more than 64 million individuals and families. With retirement, disability, and survivors benefits, Social Security is one of the most successful anti-poverty programs in our nation's his...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:48,039
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Social Security Administration

Social Security Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) has 31.97% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Social Security Administration has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Social Security Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Social Security Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MARU-SUSS1780346496
Social Security Administration

Social Security Administration

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SSA1770710407
🔒 Incident : Breach
SSA5102551100825
🔒 Incident : Breach
SSA1773182549

FAQ

Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Social Security Administration company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and Social Security Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and Social Security Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) or Social Security Administration ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) or Social Security Administration ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and Social Security Administration, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and Social Security Administration, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA