Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)
VS
City of PhiladelphiaCity of Philadelphia
U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

7115 South Boundary Boulevard , 33621-5101, Tampa, 33621-5101, US

Last Update: 01/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.centcom.mil
735/1000Moderate

USCENTCOM is a unified combatant command of the United States Department of Defense. Our mission is to direct and enable military operations and activities with allies and partners to increase regional security and stability in support of enduring U.S. interests. The U...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:331
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
City of Philadelphia

City of Philadelphia

City Hall, Philadelphia, 19102, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.phila.gov
694/1000Weak

With a workforce of 30,000 people, and opportunities in 1,000 different job categories, the City of Philadelphia is one of the largest employers in Southeastern Pennsylvania. As an employer, we operate through the guiding principles of service, integrity, respect, accou...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:11,720
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
City of Philadelphia

City of Philadelphia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) has 30.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Philadelphia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - City of Philadelphia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Philadelphia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MARU-SUSS1780346496
City of Philadelphia

City of Philadelphia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CIT149121123
🔒 Incident : Breach
CIT632072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
CIT359072625

FAQ

Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and City of Philadelphia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and City of Philadelphia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and City of Philadelphia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) or City of Philadelphia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) or City of Philadelphia ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and City of Philadelphia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and City of Philadelphia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8