Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)
VS
Assurance MaladieAssurance Maladie
U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

7115 South Boundary Boulevard , 33621-5101, Tampa, 33621-5101, US

Last Update: 01/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.centcom.mil
735/1000Moderate

USCENTCOM is a unified combatant command of the United States Department of Defense. Our mission is to direct and enable military operations and activities with allies and partners to increase regional security and stability in support of enduring U.S. interests. The U...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:331
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Assurance Maladie

Assurance Maladie

26, Avenue du Professeur André Lemierre, Paris, 75020, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Travailler à l’Assurance Maladie, c’est donner une nouvelle dimension à votre métier et agir au quotidien pour la protection de notre système de santé. Participez à une grande diversité de projets dans un cadre bienveillant et soyez fier de contribuer à une mission ess...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:28,082
Subsidiaries:70
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Assurance Maladie

Assurance Maladie

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) has 30.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Assurance Maladie in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Assurance Maladie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Assurance Maladie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MARU-SUSS1780346496
Assurance Maladie

Assurance Maladie

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ASS133730422

FAQ

Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) company and Assurance Maladie company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and Assurance Maladie, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and Assurance Maladie, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) or Assurance Maladie ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) or Assurance Maladie ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and Assurance Maladie, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U. S. Central Command (USCENTCOM) and Assurance Maladie, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA