Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TzinorotTzinorot
VS
DanfossDanfoss
Tzinorot

Tzinorot

Nir Tzvi , Nir Zvi Ramla, IL

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Tzinorot is the largest manufacturer of engineered steel pipes in Israel. Whether transporting water over hundreds of kilometers or carrying gases through pipelines in compliance with international standards, our steel pipes are designed to last. Founded in 1951, Tzino...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danfoss

Danfoss

Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, DK, 6430

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.danfoss.com
777/1000Fair

Danfoss engineers solutions that increase machine productivity, reduce emissions, lower energy consumption, and enable electrification. Our solutions are used in such areas as refrigeration, air conditioning, heating, power conversion, motor control, industrial machine...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:22,778
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tzinorot

Tzinorot

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danfoss

Danfoss

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tzinorot in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Danfoss has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Tzinorot (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tzinorot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danfoss (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danfoss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tzinorot

Tzinorot

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danfoss

Danfoss

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
REJDANDAN1774492078

FAQ

Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tzinorot company and Danfoss company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tzinorot and Danfoss, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tzinorot and Danfoss, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tzinorot or Danfoss ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tzinorot or Danfoss ?
Between Tzinorot and Danfoss, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tzinorot and Danfoss, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9