Comparison Overview
Tyson Foods

Tyson Foods
2200 W. Don Tyson Pkwy, Springdale, 72762, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The story of Tyson Foods is rooted in hard work, humility and purpose. We are a world-class food company and recognized leader in protein. Our mission is to bring high-quality food to every table in the world, safely, sustainably and affordably, now and for future gen...

JBS
Avenida Marginal Direita do Tietê, 500, São Paulo, 05118-100, BR
Last Update: 08/06/2026
Na JBS, a gente alimenta um futuro melhor. Tudo começou com uma pequena porta de um açougue, há mais de 70 anos. E, daquela porta, surgiram muitas outras. Foi acreditando em coisas simples, em fazer sempre melhor, contando com o trabalho de muita gente e abrindo portas...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tyson Foods







JBS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tyson Foods in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for JBS in 2026.
Incident History - Tyson Foods (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tyson Foods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - JBS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
JBS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tyson Foods

JBS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.