Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Texas Parks and Wildlife DepartmentTexas Parks and Wildlife Department
VS
National Park ServiceNational Park Service
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

4200 Smith School Rd., Austin, 78744, US

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.tpwd.texas.gov
592/1000Very Poor

The mission of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) is to manage and conserve the natural and cultural resources of Texas and to provide hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation opportunities for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Since our i...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:2,484
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
National Park Service

National Park Service

1849 C Street N.W., Washington, D.C., US, 20240

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nps.gov
802/1000Good

Most people know that the National Park Service cares for national parks, a network of over 420 natural, cultural and recreational sites across the nation. The treasures in this system – the first of its kind in the world – have been set aside by the American people to ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,176
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
National Park Service

National Park Service

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department has 31.51% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Park Service in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - National Park Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Park Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TXP1781807663
🔒 Incident : Breach
TXPPAY1781850513
National Park Service

National Park Service

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department company and National Park Service company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and National Park Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and National Park Service, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Texas Parks and Wildlife Department or National Park Service ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Texas Parks and Wildlife Department or National Park Service ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and National Park Service, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and National Park Service, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA