Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Twill by MaerskTwill by Maersk
VS
Brink’s IncBrink’s Inc
Twill by Maersk

Twill by Maersk

Turfmarkt 107, The Hague, 2511, NL

Last Update: 30/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.twill.net
750/1000Fair

Twill by Maersk started out with the ambition to change logistics for the better for entrepreneurs. Today, our driving ambition is to enable Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) to embrace change and move forward, giving them the confidence to pursue opportunities ...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:52
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Brink’s Inc

Brink’s Inc

1801 Bayberry Ct, Richmond, 23226, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.brinks.com
720/1000Moderate

The Brink’s Company (NYSE:BCO) is a leading global provider of cash and valuables management, digital retail solutions (DRS), and ATM managed services (AMS). Our customers include financial institutions, retailers, government agencies, mints, jewelers and other commerci...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:10,590
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Twill by Maersk

Twill by Maersk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Brink’s Inc

Brink’s Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Twill by Maersk in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

Brink’s Inc has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Twill by Maersk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Twill by Maersk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Brink’s Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brink’s Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Twill by Maersk

Twill by Maersk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Brink’s Inc

Brink’s Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UK-1785709734

FAQ

Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Twill by Maersk company and Brink’s Inc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Twill by Maersk and Brink’s Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Twill by Maersk and Brink’s Inc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Twill by Maersk or Brink’s Inc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Twill by Maersk or Brink’s Inc ?
Between Twill by Maersk and Brink’s Inc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Twill by Maersk and Brink’s Inc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2