Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TÜV Rheinland North AmericaTÜV Rheinland North America
VS
DEKRADEKRA
TÜV Rheinland North America

TÜV Rheinland North America

400 Beaver Brook Rd, Boxborough, Massachusetts, 01719, US

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tuv.com/us
764/1000Fair

TÜV Rheinland is a world leader in testing, inspection and certification services for a wide variety of industries. As a global technical service provider with over a century of experience, TÜV Rheinland’s guiding principle is to achieve sustained development of safety ...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:747
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DEKRA

DEKRA

Handwerkstr. 15, Stuttgart, 70565, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dekra.com
782/1000Fair

For 100 years, DEKRA has been a trusted name in safety. Founded in 1925 with the original goal of improving road safety through vehicle inspections, DEKRA has grown to become the world's largest independent, non-listed expert organization in the field of testing, inspec...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:14,373
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TÜV Rheinland North America

TÜV Rheinland North America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DEKRA

DEKRA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland North America in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DEKRA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TÜV Rheinland North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV Rheinland North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DEKRA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DEKRA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TÜV Rheinland North America

TÜV Rheinland North America

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DEKRA

DEKRA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America company and DEKRA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America and DEKRA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America and DEKRA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TÜV Rheinland North America or DEKRA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TÜV Rheinland North America or DEKRA ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America and DEKRA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TÜV Rheinland North America and DEKRA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2