Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TÜV Rheinland Medical DevicesTÜV Rheinland Medical Devices
VS
Henry ScheinHenry Schein
TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices

TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices

N/A

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile

Follow us and keep up to date with the dynamic regulatory environment for medical devices and in vitro diagnostics. For more than 150 years, TÜV Rheinland has stood for quality, safety, and efficiency in connection with people, the environment, and technology. As an i...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Henry Schein

Henry Schein

135 Duryea Road, Melville, 11747, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.henryschein.com
707/1000Moderate

Henry Schein, Inc. (Nasdaq: HSIC) is a solutions company for health care professionals powered by a network of people and technology. With more than 25,000 Team Schein Members worldwide, the Company's network of trusted advisors provides more than 1 million customers gl...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:10,321
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices

TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Henry Schein

Henry Schein

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Henry Schein in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Henry Schein (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Henry Schein cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices

TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Henry Schein

Henry Schein

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HEN034090625
🔒 Incident : Breach
HEN222072625

FAQ

Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices company and Henry Schein company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices and Henry Schein, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices and Henry Schein, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices or Henry Schein ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices or Henry Schein ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices and Henry Schein, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Medical Devices and Henry Schein, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2