Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TÜV Rheinland ConsultingTÜV Rheinland Consulting
VS
KPMG IndiaKPMG India
TÜV Rheinland Consulting

TÜV Rheinland Consulting

Konstantin-Wille-Straße 4-6 , Cologne, 51105, DE

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://consulting.tuv.com
752/1000Fair

Driving implementation to perform. Wir begleiten Projekte, die wirklich etwas bewegen. Als Beratungs- und Projektmanagementdienstleister von TÜV Rheinland entwickeln wir gemeinsam mit unseren Kund:innen Lösungen, die wirken. Unsere Schwerpunkte: • Nachhaltigkeit • In...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KPMG India

KPMG India

Building No. 10, 8th Floor, Tower B,, Gurugram, 122002, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
815/1000Good

KPMG entities in India are established under the laws of India and are owned and managed (as the case may be) by established Indian professionals. Established in September 1993, the KPMG entities have rapidly built a significant competitive presence in the country. Toda...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:30,260
Subsidiaries:75
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TÜV Rheinland Consulting

TÜV Rheinland Consulting

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KPMG India

KPMG India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Consulting in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG India in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TÜV Rheinland Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV Rheinland Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KPMG India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TÜV Rheinland Consulting

TÜV Rheinland Consulting

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KPMG India

KPMG India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and KPMG India company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting and KPMG India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting and KPMG India, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TÜV Rheinland Consulting or KPMG India ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TÜV Rheinland Consulting or KPMG India ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting and KPMG India, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting and KPMG India, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2