Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TÜV Rheinland ConsultingTÜV Rheinland Consulting
VS
Bain & CompanyBain & Company
TÜV Rheinland Consulting

TÜV Rheinland Consulting

Konstantin-Wille-Straße 4-6 , Cologne, 51105, DE

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://consulting.tuv.com
752/1000Fair

Driving implementation to perform. Wir begleiten Projekte, die wirklich etwas bewegen. Als Beratungs- und Projektmanagementdienstleister von TÜV Rheinland entwickeln wir gemeinsam mit unseren Kund:innen Lösungen, die wirken. Unsere Schwerpunkte: • Nachhaltigkeit • In...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bain & Company

Bain & Company

131 Dartmouth Street, Boston, MA, US, 02116

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bain.com
764/1000Fair

Bain & Company is a global consultancy that helps the world’s most ambitious change makers define the future. Across 65 cities in 40 countries, we work alongside our clients as one team with a shared ambition to achieve extraordinary results, outperform the competitio...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:22,861
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TÜV Rheinland Consulting

TÜV Rheinland Consulting

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bain & Company

Bain & Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Consulting in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Bain & Company has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - TÜV Rheinland Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV Rheinland Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bain & Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bain & Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TÜV Rheinland Consulting

TÜV Rheinland Consulting

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bain & Company

Bain & Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BAIBOS1776126313

FAQ

Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting company and Bain & Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting and Bain & Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting and Bain & Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TÜV Rheinland Consulting or Bain & Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TÜV Rheinland Consulting or Bain & Company ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting and Bain & Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TÜV Rheinland Consulting and Bain & Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1