Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Turun OsuuskauppaTurun Osuuskauppa
VS
Yves RocherYves Rocher
Turun Osuuskauppa

Turun Osuuskauppa

3 Sibeliuksenkatu, Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, FI, 20100

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tok.fi
770/1000Fair

Turun Osuuskauppa (TOK) on varsinaissuomalainen palveluyritys ja osa S-ryhmää. Toimialamme ovat marketkauppa, matkailu- ja ravitsemiskauppa, liikennekauppa sekä tavaratalo- ja erikoisliikekauppa. TOK:n henkilökuntamäärä on yli 2 600 ja vuonna 2023 liikevaihto oli reilut...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:275
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Yves Rocher

Yves Rocher

7 chemin de Bretagne, Issy les Moulineaux , 92130, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile

🌿 Welcome to Yves Rocher, Creator of Botanical Beauty. For 65 years, the Brand has combined botanical effectiveness and consideration of CSR issues. A pioneer in plant-based cosmetics, it is today the No.1* Beauty Brand in France, and shines in all four corners of the...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,382
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Turun Osuuskauppa

Turun Osuuskauppa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Yves Rocher

Yves Rocher

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turun Osuuskauppa in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yves Rocher in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Turun Osuuskauppa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turun Osuuskauppa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Yves Rocher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yves Rocher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Turun Osuuskauppa

Turun Osuuskauppa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Yves Rocher

Yves Rocher

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa company and Yves Rocher company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa and Yves Rocher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa and Yves Rocher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Turun Osuuskauppa or Yves Rocher ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Turun Osuuskauppa or Yves Rocher ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa and Yves Rocher, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Turun Osuuskauppa and Yves Rocher, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2