Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TurquoiseTurquoise
VS
Marsh McLennanMarsh McLennan
Turquoise

Turquoise

10 Paternoster Square, London, undefined, EC4M 7LS, GB

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tradeturquoise.com
753/1000Fair

This account is no longer active. Follow London Stock Exchange for latest updates.

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:63
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marsh McLennan

Marsh McLennan

1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, US, 10036

Last Update: 05/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.corporate.marsh.com
809/1000Good

Marsh (NYSE: MRSH) is a global leader in risk, strategy and people, advising clients in 130 countries across four businesses: Marsh Risk, Guy Carpenter, Mercer and Oliver Wyman. With annual revenue over $24 billion and more than 90,000 ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:45,730
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Turquoise

Turquoise

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marsh McLennan

Marsh McLennan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turquoise in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Turquoise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turquoise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marsh McLennan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Turquoise

Turquoise

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marsh McLennan

Marsh McLennan

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MAR18242223
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR307072525

FAQ

Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Turquoise company and Marsh McLennan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Turquoise and Marsh McLennan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Turquoise and Marsh McLennan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Turquoise or Marsh McLennan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Turquoise or Marsh McLennan ?
Between Turquoise and Marsh McLennan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Turquoise and Marsh McLennan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES