Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TurquoiseTurquoise
VS
Fidelity National FinancialFidelity National Financial
Turquoise

Turquoise

10 Paternoster Square, London, undefined, EC4M 7LS, GB

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

This account is no longer active. Follow London Stock Exchange for latest updates.

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:63
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fidelity National Financial

Fidelity National Financial

601 Riverside Avenue, Jacksonville, 32204, US

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.fnf.com
738/1000Moderate

Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (NYSE: FNF) is a leading provider of title insurance and transaction services to the real estate and mortgage industries. Ranked #313 on the FORTUNE 500(r) list for 2025, FNF is the nation's largest title insurance company through our t...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:20,995
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Turquoise

Turquoise

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fidelity National Financial

Fidelity National Financial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Turquoise in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity National Financial in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Turquoise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turquoise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fidelity National Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity National Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Turquoise

Turquoise

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fidelity National Financial

Fidelity National Financial

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FID823311223
🔒 Incident : Breach
FID959091725
🔒 Incident : Breach
FID027091825

FAQ

Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Turquoise company and Fidelity National Financial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Turquoise and Fidelity National Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Turquoise and Fidelity National Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Turquoise or Fidelity National Financial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Turquoise or Fidelity National Financial ?
Between Turquoise and Fidelity National Financial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Turquoise and Fidelity National Financial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3