Comparison Overview
Turner Construction Company

Turner Construction Company
66 Hudson Blvd E, New York, 10001, US
Last Update: 21/09/2026
Turner is a North America-based, international construction services company and is a leading builder in diverse and numerous market segments. The company has earned recognition for undertaking large, complex projects, fostering innovation, embracing emerging technologi...

PCL Construction
9915-56th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, CA, T6E 5L7
Last Update: 16/09/2026
PCL is a group of independent construction companies that carries out work across Canada, the United States, the Caribbean, and in Australia. These diverse operations in the civil infrastructure, heavy industrial, and buildings markets are supported by a strategic prese...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Turner Construction Company







PCL Construction






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
Turner Construction Company has 36.31% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PCL Construction in 2026.
Incident History - Turner Construction Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Turner Construction Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PCL Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PCL Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Turner Construction Company

PCL Construction
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.