Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tupolev PSC (TUPL)Tupolev PSC (TUPL)
VS
Pratt & WhitneyPratt & Whitney
Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

N/A

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tupolev.ru
739/1000Moderate

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT, US, 06108

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Pratt & Whitney, an RTX business, is a global leader in propulsion systems, powering the most advanced aircraft in the world, and we are shaping the future of aviation. Our engines help connect people, grow economies and defend freedom. Our customers depend on us to get...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:29,731
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tupolev PSC (TUPL) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pratt & Whitney in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tupolev PSC (TUPL) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tupolev PSC (TUPL) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pratt & Whitney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pratt & Whitney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TUP418060625
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRA133082125

FAQ

Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) and Pratt & Whitney, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) and Pratt & Whitney, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tupolev PSC (TUPL) or Pratt & Whitney ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tupolev PSC (TUPL) or Pratt & Whitney ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) and Pratt & Whitney, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) and Pratt & Whitney, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5