Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Tupolev PSC (TUPL)Tupolev PSC (TUPL)
VS
Federal Aviation AdministrationFederal Aviation Administration
Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

N/A

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tupolev.ru
739/1000Moderate

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, 20591, US

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.faa.gov/
762/1000Fair

The FAA is on the leading edge of a new frontier in commercial space transportation, building the next generation (NextGen) of satellite-based navigation systems, and fostering the safe integration of unmanned aerial systems into our airspace. We can only dream of what ...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:34,116
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Aviation Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tupolev PSC (TUPL) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Federal Aviation Administration in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Tupolev PSC (TUPL) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tupolev PSC (TUPL) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Federal Aviation Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Aviation Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

Tupolev PSC (TUPL)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TUP418060625
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Aviation Administration

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FAA506052325

FAQ

Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) company and Federal Aviation Administration company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) and Federal Aviation Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) and Federal Aviation Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Tupolev PSC (TUPL) or Federal Aviation Administration ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Tupolev PSC (TUPL) or Federal Aviation Administration ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) and Federal Aviation Administration, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Tupolev PSC (TUPL) and Federal Aviation Administration, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3