Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş.TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş.
VS
Jindal Steel Ltd.Jindal Steel Ltd.
TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş.

TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş.

BUĞDAY SOKAK. NO:9, ANKARA, 06700, TR

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tumad.com.tr
759/1000Fair

TÜMAD Madencilik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. değerli ve baz metaller konusunda işletmeleri, projeleri ve aramaları olan bir metalik madencilik grubudur. Stratejimiz, potansiyel görülen maden sahalarında kalitemizden ödün vermeden doğaya, çevreye, insana saygılı olarak ileri...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:536
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Centre, 12, Bhikaiji Cama Place, Delhi, New Delhi, IN, 110066

Last Update: 25/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.jindalsteel.in
804/1000Good

Jindal Steel is one of India’s foremost integrated steel producers, renowned for its scale, efficiency, and commitment to excellence. Operating on a robust mine-to-metal model, the Company leverages captive resources, advanced manufacturing capabilities, and a global di...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:20,037
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş.

TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Steel Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jindal Steel Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Jindal Steel Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jindal Steel Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş.

TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Jindal Steel Ltd.

Jindal Steel Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. company and Jindal Steel Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. and Jindal Steel Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. and Jindal Steel Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. or Jindal Steel Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. or Jindal Steel Ltd. ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. and Jindal Steel Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between TÜMAD MADENCİLİK SAN. TİC. A.Ş. and Jindal Steel Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-15511
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 up to 2.7.0.8. Affected by this vulnerability is the function system_wl_upload_pic_file of the file /usr/bin/webmgnt of the component FastCGI Backend. This manipulation of the argument filename causes os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-15510
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Leantime up to 3.8.0. Affected is the function Setting::saveSetting of the component API. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15509
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Leantime up to 3.8.0. This impacts the function editUser/addUser of the component JSON-RPC Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument role leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15508
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Helicone ai-gateway up to 0.2.0-beta.30. This affects the function build_target_url of the file ai-gateway/src/dispatcher/service.rs of the component AWS Metadata Service. Executing a manipulation of the argument extracted_path_and_query can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-15507
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in coollabsio Coolify up to 4.1.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /app/Policies/ of the component Policy Handler. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-12
UPDATED
Date2026-07-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8